Bispectral Index (BIS) and depth of anaesthesia monitoring

Take home messages

• Awareness under general anaesthesia may be as high as 1:660 anaesthetics
• Use BIS for TIVA cases, and practice on volatile
• Learn the parameters that make the number unreliable

Sweet dreams

Given all of our general anaesthetic agents work in the brain, it's rather strange that we have no way of measuring exactly how much we're giving or if it's actually working.

Sure - we have clinical parameters to reassure ourselves the patient 'must be pretty comfortable' and can measure end tidal concentrations of vapours to tell us they've got 'enough on board', but in reality, we're still sort of guessing.

Now, a patient with no muscle relaxation on board will generally give clues that they're a smidge light well before awareness is likely to become an issue, because they will flinch or frown, and we can set about getting them deep enough again.

However a paralysed patient will not, (unless for some insane reason you've decided to employ the isolated forearm technique) and this is one of the reasons why neuromuscular relaxation is such a significant risk factor for awareness.

Sadly, we're still a while away from direct point of care brain-agent concentration monitoring, however we are one step closer with the advent of EEG monitoring.

Off to sleep

General anaesthesia is a (hopefully) temporary, or reversible, state of drug-induced loss of consciousness.

The patient - quite reasonably - expects to be unaware of everything from induction to recovery, and it is this awareness that we worry about, as it is generally avoidable and unsurprisingly very distressing.

"I remember going to sleep after your injection in my arm, and some time later I was awoken by the most excruciating pain in my tummy. It felt as if my whole inside were being pulled out; I wanted to cry out or otherwise indicate my suffering but I couldn't move any part of me.

I heard the doctors talking about the gall-bladder and about doing something with it to the small intestine. Then I went to sleep again and later on woke up here in bed."

E. H. Winterbottom's case report of awareness in 1950 in a young woman underoing laparotomy for partial pancreatectomy

Yikes.

NAP 5 set out to characterise just how much of a problem awareness is, and you can read all about it here.

NAP 5

Accidental Awareness under General Anaesthesia

AnaestheasierAnaestheasier ltd.

How does EEG work?

Your brain, like your heart, runs on electricity and produces similar patterns of electrical waveforms depending on its level of activity.

By plonking electrodes all over the head, we can draw squiggly lines that represent cortical electrical activity, and then someone with the title of 'ultra highly specialised clinical electrophyiologist' or similar can read the magic squiggles and tell us whether the patient is alive, asleep, seizing or absent from the ward.

For now, we'll simplify things a bit.

When wide awake, it generally produces lower amplitude but higher frequency waves.

When fast asleep, higher amplitude but slower, more regular waveforms start to appear, as shown in this nice summary:

It's a little more complex than that.

Your brain actually pumps out a whole chaotic variety of waveforms, and the more electrodes you stick on the person's head, the more waves you're going to see.

What then happens is a clever machine does clever things including a Fourier transformation (make sure you say those words in the exam) to produce four characteristic waves that we know as:

• beta - β - 13-30 Hz (fastest)
• alpha - α - 7-13 Hz
• theta - θ - 3.5-7 Hz
• delta - δ - 0.5-3.5 Hz (slowest)

In short beta = wide awake, while delta = fast asleep.

How reliable is it?

Ah the million dollar question - can I trust it?

'Sort of' is the answer.

You've probably worked with consultants that quite happily run TIVA without any depth of anaesthesia monitoring, because that's how they did it for many years before BIS came along.

They know with next to 100% reliability that if you've pumped a certain amount of propofol and remifentanil into a person of a certain age and weight, and the cannula is visible and working, and they've got a heart rate and systolic that barely sum to 150 - then the patient is probably asleep enough.

This still applies if you're using BIS - you've just got an extra layer of reassurance if the BIS is 39.

BIS should be an 'extra check' rather than your primary monitoring end point.

It is not a definitive 'yes that's enough' in the way that MAC is commonly used. They're more of a 'if the heart rate and blood pressure are chilled, then you're probably fine' kind of vibe.

BIS is good for TIVA

Largely because we don't have any other option, but mostly because BIS correlates pretty reliably with plasma concentrations of propofol when we actually measure them.

If you apply the electrodes properly, avoid ketamine and nitrous, use propofol and tell your BIS monitor to alarm if it wanders outside the range of 40-60, then it seems to work as well at avoiding awareness as if you use vapour and tell it to alarm outside of a MAC of 0.7-1.3.

One of the key things to appreciate is whether there is anything else going on that might make your reading unreliable.

Any other benefits?

Yes, actually, BIS helps save money and the environment, because if you use it properly, patients tend to use up less anaesthetic and wake up quicker (because you've not overanaesthetised them unnecessarily).

Unsurprisingly they also have fewer side effects such as nausea and vomiting and cognitive dysfunction.

So should I use it?

Yes.

Practice with it on vapour cases, learn to incorporate it into your anaesthetic management and definitely use it for relaxed TIVA cases.

Just remember it's another number on the screen, and not the be all and end all of your anaesthesia.

A final top tip

• Use a validated TCI model, and watch at what estimated plasma concentration that patient actually falls asleep - then use this as a reference point to ensure your patient doesn't risk waking up during surgery

Useful Tweets

References and Further Reading

Primary FRCA Toolkit

Members receive 60% discount off the FRCA Primary Toolkit. If you have previously purchased a toolkit at full price, please email anaestheasier@gmail.com for a retrospective discount.

Discount is applied as 6 months free membership - please don't hesitate to email Anaestheasier@gmail.com if you have any questions!

Just a quick reminder that all information posted on Anaestheasier.com is for educational purposes only, and it does not constitute medical or clinical advice.